From Japan to SL

Kant by Lollito Larkham. The table makes a reference to the habit of Kant of lunch regularly with an unknown person. What did Kant see in front of the stranger? How could a man in the thought so vast take refuge with the imperturbable mold of time and of the habits? After all, phirosopers could be strange.
The Philosopher’s Stone: http://maps.secondlife.com/secondlife/LEA17/35/222/25




This is also an art for Kant. It sould be out of manner to stand here, but in fabor of the theme, fun and entertaining. But I never play down phirosophers. In days of them, philosphers might be akin to scientists. Modern cosmology could be said to be approaching phirosophical area. It made me think anew about importance of studying the basic of thinking.




Heidegger by Barry Richez. Again I have not studied what this phirosopher did.




This is also for Heidegger. An ant does not have sophisticated intelligence but they design and create huge ant hill through collaboration and jobsharing. How to create the intellect as a group out of numerous ants could be connected to the conscious in the human brain in which individual neuron does not have intelligence. Modern science can explain the system theoretically to some extent, but how did Heidegger make out of it?




Hume by Scottius Polke. It could mean an assortment of various ideas and components, but I only got a beauty.




Spinoza by Ub Yifu. I have to give up. Is this spinning because of spinoza? No way, sorry.




Arendt by Winter Nightfire. Was he pursueing good and evil at a war? Here the artist tried to illustrate the imaginations of woman visiting other woman's mind. But I only saw the beautiful garden.




Under the polished floor reflected images were set, but there is alpha-crash caused by doubled transparent textures. I would conclude this very rude visit to the arts of philosopy by words, “Satya resides under woman’s skirt.” Thank you the organizer and artists for providing me with a chance to look insde the unknown for me.